Married at First Sight UK: Three ways the dating show has changed for the worse
After
watching the first British series of Married at First Sight, I thought
it was one of the most authentic dating shows.
The
reality show aims to scientifically match applicants with someone they believe
could be a suitable partner but the two only meet for the first time on their wedding
day. From this day they attempt to build a connection and see if they can make
it as a married couple.
Married at First Sight UK series seven cast |
The
selection process for the first season took over a year, there were only three
couples, whose relationships were supported by five experts. I then went on to
watch a couple of the early American seasons and the format was similar, although
Americans reality TV stars seem naturally better at creating drama than the Brits.
But as
the show continued to expand globally, with more couples getting involved each
season, it became less clear how authentic the selection process was and I became
less interested in the programme. It doesn’t help that the beginning of each
series is highly repetitive as we watch each couple wed and go on to their
honeymoons.
Still
after consuming an unhealthy amount of reality TV since the summer (and for me
that is saying something), I decided to revisit the dating show to see how much
it has changed and if the changes have been for the better or worse.
THREE WAYS MARRIED AT FIRST SIGHT HAS CHANGE
COUPLES MEETING UP DURING THE PROCESS
Positives: Building a friendship with couples that are going through the same
unique experience as you gives all the couples involved in the experiment a
support system. They are people who could empathise with what they’re going through because
it’s not just a normal marriage it is an accelerated process that many won’t
understand.
Divided
into men and women (or where they felt most comfortable), they were all
introduced to each other before their wedding days which allowed them to bond
over the reasons they joined the process. Gemma and Whitney connected over the fact that they would be walking down the aisle by themselves as
their important parental figures sadly had passed. They hugged each other in
support after learning about their similar stories.
Through
the process the married couples met weekly at dinner parties and the commitment
ceremony to seek help from the experts and decide if they want to stay together.
It is clear when Gemma and Matt joined the
process mid-way through that they were looking forward to the opportunity to
share their experiences during their volatile marriage with people who would
understand.
Negatives: Let’s be real with ourselves, the reason this was started was to provide
opportunities for drama to be created. With 14 couples total being in series
seven, there is ample opportunity for individuals to clash and for drama to
start which this season Thomas was more than happy to provide. The Liverpudlian
consistently argued with April and Whitney during the show and later turned on
newcomer Sophie.
The group
settings can also become a pile on for people that hold different views to the
rest of the group. After making tasteless comments about women’s body and stating
that he would leave his wife if she put on weight for non-medical reasons, Jonathan
was often criticised around the dinner table for these comments. Although I completely
disagree with what he said, the group (and editing) unfairly reduced him to
that terrible opinion and offered him no mercy, constantly holding his feet to
the flame of his offensive remark.
This group
dynamic also gave couples something else to attribute their problems to. April
and George were more than happy to blame the idea that their relationship was
fake, harped on by Thomas (surprise, surprise), and their lack of trust in each
other on what other couples have said. They chose to blissfully ignore the
fact that George had trust issues since their honeymoon when there were no
other couples around.
2.
STAYING IN AN APARTMENT INSTEAD THEIR HOMES
Positives: I always get weary when watching reality TV shows when there are
children involved, as they could get equally if not more upset than their
parents by the breakdown of a relationship. So couples living in an apartment complex
together during the experiment avoids getting children emotionally involved in a
relationship that may not work out. Plus it is a neutral ground so neither
party can be territorial about their space or their things.
Negatives: Living in an apartment complex doesn’t show the couples the realities
of living together which contestants in the early seasons were able to experience.
They got to see how their lifestyles differ to their partners, how they would
fit into each other’s lives as well as consider realistically who would move.
Also
living in an apartment complex gave contestants a day off from the marriage
when they felt like it. After Kwame upset Kasia with his comments about why
they don’t have sex and removing her autonomy over her body, Kasia locked her
husband out of the apartment. When she decided that she was ready to have him
back, Kwame was in no rush to return to their shared apartment. Space is
necessary in a relationship, but so is facing your problems. Living in the
apartment complex with the option to move to another apartment so easily meant
couples could readily run away from their problems, prolonging issues instead of
solving them.
3. INTRODUCING
NEW COUPLES
Positive: If I have to push to
come up with a positive aspect, the introduction of new married couples midway
through the season means that more applicants are given the opportunity to develop
connections and find love.
Negatives: It adds more dynamics
to already large cauldron of contrasting personalities and easily creates drama
and tensions. Gemma and Matt didn’t manage one day without arguing and this
spilled over to the rest of the group as their couples retreat descended into
yelling and tears.
Also these late additions call into to question the science
of the show, which I doubt was that strong to begin with. The reasons the experts
gave for matching Johnathan and Sophie, highlighting that they have both previously
been unlucky in love and their desire to have children in the future, seemed
surface level reasons for two people to commit to each other for life. Their
differences of loving town life vs. city life and vastly different career ambitions
are two things they contrast on and may not be able to get over and should have
factored in more strongly than their previous dating history.
Along with new married couples, there was the inclusion of
the dating couple Matt and Whitney, who after failing to find romance in their
original couples, found it with each other. When allowing them to re-join the process
as a non-married couple, after criticising the dramatic way their relationship started,
the experts claimed that they’d looked at the science and that on paper Matt
and Whitney would work as a couple. They didn’t however, explain specifically
the traits and qualities that the two matched on making it clear that it was just
a decision to keep fanning the flames of drama on the show. Their fellow contestants
were clearly not pleased. Zoe regularly let the dating couple know that she felt
they had disrespected the process, the experts and the fellow married couples
by cheating on their initial partners and then requesting to be allowed to
continue in the process.
Married at First Sight UK Poster
Clearly
the show has changed dramatically since its inception and perhaps necessarily
so, as the franchise continues to grow in popularity globally. The newest New
Zealand based season started being broadcast in the UK this past August. Though
I may not be happy about the changes made to the show as they take it away from
its objective of creating long lasting marriages, I cannot say that I didn’t enjoy
this season and lapped up every bit of drama. Matt and Whitney’s love affair
was a messy drama plot twist that will go down in reality TV history. Still, it
is a shame that the show had to stray away from its authentic roots to become
more successful.
Comments
Post a Comment