Murder on the Orient Express (Film)
‘to a man with a hammer
every job is a nail’ - Mary Debenham

At the start of the film, I began to warm up to Poirot as he
made jokes, was slightly OCD and had quite a comical moustache but it did begin to irritate me as time went on. Still his lack
of modesty and his facts seemingly coming out of nowhere are two things that
still haven’t changed and that I can’t over look about his character but as
this is the same for me when reading Christie’s other classic ‘The Murder of Roger Ackroyd’, so the film does appear to somewhat stay true to the original.
There were also other Christie like things in the film such
as how the murder is initially shown, the closed circle of Cluedo like suspects
and how Poriot takes control at the end, much to my dissatisfaction.
As someone who hasn’t
read the book each revelation was surprising but unbeliveable. I found the motive for
murder to be too complex and coincidental to be plausible as I felt the need to
pause the film and jot down each connection to make sense of it, which caused
me to gradually become less engaged with the film as it came to an end. Also
once again I’m not satisfied with how Poriot discovers his facts because I feel
that he uses intuition more so than evidence. Although I think the film does
well to present something that appears like a clear attempt at Christie, it
does what many films based on something or remakes do too often nowadays which
is originality. Though you can make the argument that most people wouldn’t be
happy with sort of change to the storyline but for me an attempt would’ve been
appreciated.

Overall, although the film had my attention at the start it
gradually declines during the investigation when every characters unconvincing
secret is revealed, though I’m not surprised because I believe the book will
always be better than the film.
Comments
Post a Comment